compromise between the colonists and king of england?

              To be blunt, there was no way the king of england would ever compromise to losing the money he would gain from the colonists and there was no way that the future members of those who wrote the declaration would ever believe that king George would simply make a change his ways because some people politely asked to change certain things. Because in King George's eyes he saw the thirteen original colonies as an asset and perhaps a child of its mother colony. This was obvious to many of the merchants and farmers, because certain things like tobacco, cotton and such things that couldn't grow bountifully in england were grown in the thirteen original colonies. These little signs like this said that a war was coming. that would definitely change both countries and or soon to be countries of their own.
                  Also the King of england would have also given signs of a compromise. For example, he didn't have to make such acts that raised the taxes of certain products. This certainly didn't help the thirteen colonies economy. upon the taxes from the products they bought from overseas, there were barbarous and persistent English  tax collectors. This raised a boiling point on both sides when neither of them could compromise. leading up to the Boston massacre and the Boston tea party. Besides if there was a compromise, the united states of america wouldn't be here today. As corrupt and cruel as america came to be, we wouldn't not be able to call this place "home". let alone north america or the united states, even Canada would have been sieged and taken over.